Kelly Clarkson: Reba McEntire Is Going To Be My Mother-In-Law

Screen shot 2012-12-17 at 5.21.08 PM

After dating for only a year, pop star Kelly Clarkson is engaged

Does Jennifer Lopez Think She’s “Better” Than Her Staff?

Screen shot 2012-12-17 at 2.33.49 PM

J. Lo might have had a humble beginning as a “Fly Girl” on In Living Color, but according to tabloids she is as big a diva as ever!

Alessandra Ambrosio Heats Up St Barts

Screen shot 2012-12-17 at 12.43.31 PM

If you need a reason to smile this Monday morning, maybe this will help. These images of Victoria’s Secret contract model Alessandra Ambrosio just came across our desk and we couldn’t help but share them.

View All
51

Janet Jackson: I Don’t Need Michael’s Money

Posted on August 17th, 2012 at 9:21 am
Fixed

Janet Jackson wants the world to know that she does NOT need financial help from Michael Jackson’s estate to help maintain a property she owns in Las Vegas.

Earlier this week it was reported that the Estate of Michael Jackson filed court documents requesting that the estate be permitted to “foot a portion of the bill on Janet’s mortgage on her posh Las Vegas condo.”

Janet’s lawyer says that his client ”owns a home, not a condo, in Las Vegas which she bought for her mother ten years ago. A home which has never had a mortgage.” The attorney adds, “It is important to note that this is a home which Janet has never spent a night and only visited once.”

A rep for Jackson tells RumorFix, “All of these stories remain a distraction from the central issue: the veracity of the will and the safety of the Jackson family.”

That being said, the Janet Jackson mortgage controversy appears to be over for now, but there’s still more to come in the Jackson family battle over control of Michael’s millions.

Around The Web
    • Guest

      FIRST OFF Katherine Jackson filed court documents in which she states that MICHAEL supported her during her whole life, never mentioned Janet. Now the Estate is supporting her according to Michael’s will indeed.

      I’m starting to think that it’s actually team Janet who gives fake info to TMZ to make it appear that she is a victim of perfid media. I wouldn’t be surprised at all by discovering that.

      Janet and the others are trying to steal Michael’s patrimony from his children. Michael’s will speaks volume. He made it clear that NONE of them parasites have his money, but they can’t accept that and put up this plot to get what never is gonna belong to them. 

      • Anonymous

        LOL..  WHY  SHOULD  jANET  SUPPORT  kATHERINE  WHEN   she  gets this income  from MJ’s  Will….oops..

        • http://www.facebook.com/jerilyn.bridges Jerilyn Bridges

           Sounds like a rat to me! Janet has a house in Las Vegas and Gary Indiana. Why does her mother all of a sudden need money because Janet has her own! Maybe Ms. Jackson is about to blow the lid off Michael Katherine and all of the lies!
             This is not about a will at all! This is about siblings letting the world know that they got their own! The press will slowly and surely admit that Michael NEVER supported anybody but his kids! The last one to clear themselves of that lie will be Randy! Then they will leave Katherine the estate and children to ponder why they seem to be happier without all of them!

          • Anonymous

            lol  I used  to see  Jonesat MJJ’s  office..  he  always  looked  so  sour.lol

            • http://www.facebook.com/jerilyn.bridges Jerilyn Bridges

               Not what My brother said! He said they didn’t even have offices after a while!

            • Anonymous

              he  did  10964  wilshire blvd  in westwood..
                then  his officemoved  to  sunset blvd.. after  that no more..
              last time  I saw Jones was  at  universal  studios   when  they were shooting    SCREAM.

          • Anonymous

            Katherine didn’t need to say anything  to make  MJ  look  good.. MJ  owns  Hayvenhurst.. as  Joe  sold  him  his  share in  the 1980′s..   since  then Mj was  the ne  footing  the  bill  of  that household.. in a roundabout way   MJ was  supporting  some  of his  siblings  like  Jermaine  &  Randy   as they  ket  dumping   their  ex’s  &  kids  there..

            MJ  gave  katherine  monthly allowance..  &  K  doled it  out  to  her other kids.. in  essence this is  still  what’s going  on   with her  40%..I am  sure  MJ knew that  will  happen..  but  it  will  all  end  when  Katherine  dies..as  Mj  didn’t leave provisions  in  HIs  Trust for his other  siblings  &  their kids  outside of  tito’s   &  those  2 nieces. 

          • Anonymous

            now  Jerilyn..  talking  abut  Jemie  &    his  kiddies  with  this woman.. why  would  anyone name his  sons  Jaafer  &  Jermajesty>>  sounds like names for  giraffes at the  zoo..

            at least Blanket is a nickname  &  even cute..  MJ  nicknames him  that  after  the dangling  incident  as  he  was covered with a blanket.

            but Jaafer  & Jermajesty  in  their  birth certificates??  geez!

    • Anonymous

      lol..  the  central issue  of  heveracity of  MJ’s  WILL???   are they  so  thick  in  the head????  what for more  do  they  need  to KNOW–   the Judge    just ruled against Hward  Mann’s  & hs  sleazy  business  deals  with Katherine.. WHICH MEANS..  THE  JUDGE    RECOGNISES  THE  WILL AS  LEGIT  &  GENUINE !!!!

      aren’t  Janet  & her fumbling  cohorts  using  Howard  Mann’s   lame  rubbish to  fight  the  veracity of  this WiLL??? phish..    what a bunch  of losers!

      • http://www.facebook.com/jerilyn.bridges Jerilyn Bridges

         If he judgewas from any other state than california, that would be it! However, judges in this state have not only been overrulled, but a lot of them were barred for judicial misconduct! : especially probate judges. They see money and they rull anyway they want until a federal investigation shows that they had monetary interest in the case. I think this judge should have recused himself from the case! No matter, if his hands are trully clean, the ruling stands. If they are not, well this goes on forever!

        • Anonymous

          I  think with this WILL–  it   will  stand..    BEST  CLUE?  that judge  that ruled against  Mann..  and  the  siblings  were/are in cahoots with  him.. to prove the  Will is  fake.

          anyway– when  it  cameto MJ’s will–  I  really  do believe   the  courts   threaded  very carefully.. as  this  was  so  high  profile  &  Joe  & Randy  were challenging  it  from  the get go..   it  went   all  the  way  to  the  supreme  court..

          • http://www.facebook.com/jerilyn.bridges Jerilyn Bridges

            At the risk of repeating myself! This judge ruled on other Jackson matters. That means his ruling is suspect: Mann is filing an appeal! I’ve heard of lawyers beind disbarred for less!
              Heck one was disbarred for not acknowleging an illegitemate child during a probate hearing! The judge lost his bench and the Estate was forced to pay quite a tidy sum!
                  On the other hand, if these executors can show that they have done due dilligence they may get a cash bonus from relatives grateful for their efforts on “behalf of the deceased” Even if they don’t like the outcome!
             An honest executor can show where a man left out all of the relatives except the children and that will influence relatives enough for them to consider NOT funding the decased’s favorite charities or divertint their mass holdings to lesser well off relatives! Either way the relatives always pay the executor a nice “fee” for showing ” due dilligence. My advice: show them all they need to know including the “E signature and corresponding documents” They will be calmer now and with fewer persons protesting the will you’re bound to get some dough !

            • Anonymous

              i  do  believe youare  making  something  so straightforward  complicated.    that WILL  has already  gone to  the  Calfirnia  supreme  curt  which  I have  also b een  repeating myself .

              so..  what’s more  when  Joe  himself  tried to  challenge  the  ill way before  Probate  in  2009..  he was kicked out  as he’s not a beneficiary.   and same  with  these  siblings..

            • Anonymous

              MJ’s executors  dont  need to  do  diddly  to  his  siblings–  they are  NOT  in  HIs Will  or  TRUST..  they   mak/do  repirts  to  the   court.  even  their  fee  is under the court’s  apporval.

    • Katie G001

      Janet probably knew nothing of this request for extra money for the Vegas home b/c the money is likely actually for Randy, Jermaine and Joe and has nothing to do with the Vegas residence. Katherine must have a “reason” for getting extra money and that reason must be for her care or the care of the children . The executors have to present the request to probate court who determines if the reason is in keeping with the will ( only for KJ and the kids). So Randy, Jermaine and Joe manipulate KJ to get her to request more, just as they always have done . Just another scheme to get their hands on some money. And Katherine , as before Michael’s death, cannot stand up to them. She goes along with it because they talk her into it. She is sensitive like Mj and is likely very easily manipulated by sweet talk or sad stories of woe and pain. Obviously, if she blindly complied with their bidding just b/c they told her a doctor ordered her to not communicate with anyone for two weeks , even though she knew they were challenging the estate, and she could not make the call on her own to question the situation in any way at all,  she is at risk for being manipulated again…and again…and again. She seems a bit simple and lacks a backbone and manipulators zero in on that and take full advantage whenever possible.  The estate probably released info about the request and letting this detail speak for itself. Another example of another scheme .

      • Anonymous

        apparently this  request was made  bfore  the recent  ruckus..the estate  filedi with probate ..
        everything changed with  that ruckus

        • WATK

          Exactly. The request was made before the Arizona scheme occurred when KJ was still trying to sneak cash to the Jackson men under the table via bogus expense requests. But they went ahead and pulled the trigger on their power play scam before the request was processed. I’m sure everything has changed now. I think KJ will likely drop this request now that it has been made public and people can put two and two together. Likely this will limit future requests of this kind. I think the executors are playing hard ball with the family and using Prince and Paris’ tactic of using media to effectively shut this nonsense down. They are just shining a big light on the actual behavior of the people involved. Shady business can only be played out in the shade- not in the bright, glaring  light.

          • Anonymous

            you   know– this is  what  makes  me  question  Kattherine.. she knows  MJ  left    half  a billion  in  debt  plus  MJ was  being  sued  way   out  to t he  gazoo so  MJ’s executors  had  their work cut out  for  them  to start  with..  a mammoth  job  to say  the  least..they  had to make a ready  income  for  the estate..#1..  the  shift   through  all  that  debt..  &  lawsuits..  as a lot of  them were  frivolous.THEN  A  YEAR AGO  O SO..  kATHERINE  COMPLAINS SHE  IS ONLY GETTING $30,000???  & NEEDED MORE  MONEY?? and  this  is how  she  explained  gettinginto  business  with Howard  Mann  who  was introduced  to her  by  son  Randy????   do  you  smell  a  rat????

            didn’t  she   realize t he executors  had  to  sort  out MJ’s  debts  &  affairs  first??  which  they  were  doing..  paying  off  those debt..  &  she moans??   then  these  greedy  sods  she  calls  her kids   were  cmplaining about t hese executors??  !

            LET’S  SEE W HAT THEY W OULD HAVE DONE IF  THEY WERE  IN CHARGE??!..LOKE NOTHING!   more likely  pocket  whatever money was aound  then  sell  off  MJ’s music  catalogue.,  then  divide  it amongst themselves..

            I  recall Joe was  seething  after  hearing of  the  Will.. comparing  it  to Elvis  who   kept it  all in his  family..  but  what they  or anyone else consider..  Elvis  always  had his father     take care  of his  books..   who hardly   did well  ..why  Elvis never  made  any sound investments.. all  he  had  was Graceland   &  a  few  hundred  thous  in  cash  whn he  died.  Elvis   Had his dad  as  his executor.. &  Lisa  Marie  as  his  sole  beneficiary.. but  Priscilla  was  the  guardian..  why    when  Presley  sr  was  dying.. Priscilla  begged  him  to mak  her executrix.. which  he  did..

            Pris  had  good reasn  t make  the Presley  estate a money  maker  hence  opening Graceland..  bec  she’ll make 10%  of it’s annual  revenue..  she  became a  very rich  woman from  this..

            then  these Jack  4 complain  Mj’s executrs  are crooks  fr making  10%  of  it;s annual  earnings??   LOL..

            anyway..  this ruckus  will  backfire  on  them..  if  Branca  etc  co  were keeping  a  blind  eye  to Katherine’s  allowanceamneuvering… now  the  court  will check it out..  as  everything is  under it’s watchful eye..   they  only  lose.

            then the  Judge  ruled against  Mann??!  LOLOLOL.. it means  Katherine  cannot bequet?  that  businss  transaction  to  Randy  et co.. all nipped  in  the  bud.  as no  doubt their  motive was  to  compete  with the  MJ estate..

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PO4C5OVP7BWJTDIPDDNEIWKDFI Arabia May

      THIS GOES TO SHOW EVERYONE WHO IS IN DOUBT; THAT THE EXECUTORS ARE REALLY TRYING TO DISCREDIT JANET BECAUSE SHE QUESTIONED THE WILL. THEY HAVE PRINTED LIE AFTER LIE AND I FEEL THAT THE FBI SHOULD STEP IN BECAUSE THOSE EXECUTORS KNOW DAMN WELL THAT WILL IS FAKE. I HOPE JANET KEEPS PUSHING FOR THE TRUTH, AND EVERY TIME TMZ, WHO’S ATTORNIES ARE FRIENDS WITH MCCLAIN AND BRANCA PRINT A FALSE ARTICLE, JANET NEEDS TO SUI THEM, THIS IS THE SECOND LIKE THAT TMZ HAS PRINTED, I AM A BIG JANET FAN, AND I REMEMBER WHEN SHE PURCHASED THIS HOME FOR KATHERINE JACKSON BACK IN 2002 SHE BOUGHT IT CASH, AND IT IS NOT A CONDO , IT IS A HOME. JANET WAS SUPPORTING KATHERINE & JOE WHILE MICHAEL WAS ALIVE AND SHE STILL SUPPORTS THEM TO THIS DAY. JANET IS WORTH 350 MILLION WITH A BILLIONAIRE FIANCE ON HER ARMS, SO SHE DOES NOT NEED MICHAEL’S MONEY. JANET HAS NEVER HAD FINANCIAL PROBLEMS LIKE MICHAEL

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PO4C5OVP7BWJTDIPDDNEIWKDFI Arabia May

      THIS GOES TO SHOW EVERYONE WHO IS IN DOUBT; THAT THE EXECUTORS ARE REALLY TRYING TO DISCREDIT JANET BECAUSE SHE QUESTIONED THE WILL. THEY HAVE PRINTED LIE AFTER LIE AND I FEEL THAT THE FBI SHOULD STEP IN BECAUSE THOSE EXECUTORS KNOW DAMN WELL THAT WILL IS FAKE. I HOPE JANET KEEPS PUSHING FOR THE TRUTH, AND EVERY TIME TMZ, WHO’S ATTORNIES, ARE FRIENDS WITH MCCLAIN AND BRANCA PRINT A FALSE ARTICLE, JANET NEEDS TO SUI THEM, THIS IS THE SECOND TIME  TMZ HAS PRINTED A LIE ON JANET & HAD TO RETRACT THE STORY. I AM A BIG JANET FAN, AND I REMEMBER WHEN SHE PURCHASED THIS HOME FOR KATHERINE JACKSON BACK IN 2002 SHE BOUGHT IT CASH, AND IT IS NOT A CONDO , IT IS A HOME. JANET WAS SUPPORTING KATHERINE & JOE WHILE MICHAEL WAS ALIVE AND SHE STILL SUPPORTS THEM TO THIS DAY. JANET IS WORTH 350 MILLION WITH A BILLIONAIRE FIANCE ON HER ARMS, SO SHE DOES NOT NEED MICHAEL’S MONEY. JANET HAS NEVER HAD FINANCIAL PROBLEMS LIKE MICHAEL

      • Guest

        Um…TMZ may have lied for ratings but the video did not. That actually WAS Janet Jackson in the video filming her neice and nephew and smirking at them with her brother, Randy, wasn’t it ? The executors did not pay actors to do that , did they ?

         Let’s remember why TMZ is even talking about Ms. Jackson so much : TMZ nor the executors caused her to drive her SUV to Callabassas and lie in wait for her neice and nephew to get out of school, follow them, force her way through the gate on their tail and confront them in an advesarial manner, allow a physical brawl to occur in the children’s presence while Ms. Jackson filmed it to be used later against the people in the home and make the children flee out the back of their home into a canyon for their safety ( and for the record, none of my aunts and uncles have ever made me feel the need to flee my home into a canyon for my safety from what they have brought to my home…so let’s agree that it was not a “mere misunderstanding”). TMZ and the executors have just refused her request to not make her incredible behavior public.

        TMZ nor the executors asked Janet and her fellow stooges to have a bogus doctor instruct her mother to get on a plane. TMZ and the executors did not lie to Katherine and take her to Arizona without her knowledge , feed her bs about doctor’s orders, cut her off from all communication and tell her the kids were fine and dandy when in fact they were panicked b/c they did not know where their guardian was. TMZ and the executors did not allow Katherine to go on national tv and read a statement prepared by her adult children and make statements she did not have full information about. They also did not treat Michael’s children as though they were on the outside of the “family circle” around Katherine. The executors did not release pictures of grandma playing cards with other children while telling the three in her care that she did not wish to speak to them.
        Ms. Jackson probably doesn’t have financial problems. She and her siblings have serious character problems, or so it appears by her own behavior…not the TMZ reports. If there is a real concern about the validity of the will, and the 3 previous to it which said exactly the same thing as this one and named Branca in all versions, she should take it to court , not attempt schemes and power plays. If she fears her mother is in some danger from people around her, normal daughters get their ass off the yacht and go visit mom and stay with her for awhile to make sure all is well and safe and if not take legal action to address the issue.

        Janet has discredited herself .

        • Anonymous

          Every piece of info you just gave came from some disgruntled family member who is probably the one who leaked the video and is making up stories about Janet and feeding them to TMZ. 

          • Anonymous

            actually,it was  trent  ho  gve t he clip  to  TMZ–  to  protect the kids,

            • Anonymous

              Protect the kids from who? Their own Aunts and Uncles? There is nothing conclusive on the tape anyway. Doesn’t Trent live in that house mooching off the MJ’s estate like the rest of the unsuccessful Jackson’s? If so, how can you really trust a single thing he says? I think I’ll believe the woman who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars herself and is dating a BILLIONAIRE. Money is NOT Janet’s motivation. 

            • Anonymous

                t rent  works  for  the  estate.. h was  the one who also  called  the  cops..

              as for  Janet..   I’m not impress  she’s  bonking some arab  billionaire..  so  what..  he’s  not attractive anyway.. she’s not  as  rich as  people think  after aying  off her ex–renee.. 

            • Anonymous

              1. If Trent works for the estate now then he is NOT a neutral 3rd party. He has a monetary interest to protect. And what was his job before he decided to cash in on MJ’s death?

              2. It doesn’t matter if you find Janet’s boyfriend attractive! Obviously SHE does and that’s all that matters. If she was really such a gold-digger she would have made that man put a ring on it a LONG time ago. 

              3. I don’t know how much money she had to pay to that Mexican but I’m sure you don’t know either. Janet has NEVER been in the news for financial troubles. That was Michael’s problem. I’m sure TMZ would have been the 1st to report if she was broke. Just like they did with MJ. And as I said above, Janet couldn’t have been that broke if she was paying some of Michael’s bills and giving him million dollar loans!!

            • WATK

              Trent was hired long before MJ’s death by Mj to assist his mother in day to day caregiving. He is Joe’s nephew and MJ gave him a job . By all accounts prior to this incident Katherine was close to Trent and relied on and trusted in him. He’s been like a body guard and personal assistant. If they think he is doing something wrong they should press charges not spout vague innuendo to the press.

            • Anonymous

              huh??  where thehell  did  you  find–Janet was giving  MJ  million dollar loans??  you’re worse than TMZ  here..

              and  where  did  I  say  Janet  was  brole– I w rote    she’s not  as  rich  as people think..  2  different things!  and  she did  pay  off  Renee..  oodles..  I mean  a lot..  like  half was  what  he wanted.

            • Anonymous

              don’t  you  get it    yet??  Katherine is now  82..  her  yrs are numbered.. MJ left an  interesting  Will  ..  that  he left  Katherine  40%  of  the  estate  earnings  after  expenses..  I have  to keep  expounding on this as  MJ left  those  debts.. 

              MJ knew  Katherine  will  siphin her mney  to his siblings.. like  she  did  with  fuds  he  gave her  when alive.  but  here’s  the  crunch..  it  will all come  to  a screeching  halt  when  Katherine dies.. as her  40 %  wil  revert back  to  the estate  for his  kids.  though MJ left  some proviso  for  Tito’s 3  sons  &  2 nieces..  who  I  think are  Jackies daughters.  that’s  about  it..

            • Anonymous

              yeah..  toprotect  the kids  fromsuch  awful  aunts  &  uncles a s  they  turned out  to  be..   the estate had good  cause  to  ban  them  from  the  calabasas  home..which  the  estate  pays  for..

          • guest

            No, the information came from A) a video starring Janet and Randy as they confront the children smirking and filming them- unless those were actors impersonating the Jackson sibs to make her look bad. But it sure looks like her.  B) Katherine Jackson’s statement to the court when she asked for custody back and told the court these things C) Katherine Jackson’s attorney who stated these things occurred and that she saw the video of the children fleeing the home into the canyon on the security video. D) Prince Jackson’s screen shot of the group text and it’s reply from none other than Janet Jackson herself. Probably altered by Prince to make Janet look bad, right ? E) pictures Reebie released of KJ in Arizona- someone stole them from Rebbie and released them to make the jackson siblings look crazy , right ? I am sure they had nothing to do with it.  F) GMA moment when KJ read her statement with her adult children surrounding her – I presume Ms. Jackson and her siblings agreed to stand there for that, correct? Or was that a bunch of imposters trying to discredit her? Cause it sure looked like her and her siblings standing there looking bizarre and shady.
            And who is this mysterious ” disgruntled family member” ? An argument that only names ” them and they” with no concrete facts or names is not an argument. It’s a smoke screen when you don’t have an argument. If she puts a credible argument before a court in a legal fashion, only then will her accusations be validated.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PO4C5OVP7BWJTDIPDDNEIWKDFI Arabia May

      THIS GOES TO SHOW EVERYONE WHO IS IN DOUBT; THAT THE EXECUTORS ARE REALLY TRYING TO DISCREDIT JANET BECAUSE SHE QUESTIONED THE WILL. THEY HAVE PRINTED LIE AFTER LIE AND I FEEL THAT THE FBI SHOULD STEP IN BECAUSE THOSE EXECUTORS KNOW DAMN WELL THAT WILL IS FAKE. I HOPE JANET KEEPS PUSHING FOR THE TRUTH, AND EVERY TIME TMZ, WHO’S ATTORNIES, ARE FRIENDS WITH MCCLAIN AND BRANCA PRINT A FALSE ARTICLE, JANET NEEDS TO SUI THEM, THIS IS THE SECOND TIME  TMZ HAS PRINTED A LIE ON JANET & HAD TO RETRACT THE STORY. I AM A BIG JANET FAN, AND I REMEMBER WHEN SHE PURCHASED THIS HOME FOR KATHERINE JACKSON BACK IN 2002 SHE BOUGHT IT CASH, AND IT IS NOT A CONDO , IT IS A HOME. JANET WAS SUPPORTING KATHERINE & JOE WHILE MICHAEL WAS ALIVE AND SHE STILL SUPPORTS THEM TO THIS DAY. JANET IS WORTH 350 MILLION WITH A BILLIONAIRE FIANCE ON HER ARMS, SO SHE DOES NOT NEED MICHAEL’S MONEY. JANET HAS NEVER HAD FINANCIAL PROBLEMS LIKE MICHAEL

      • Anonymous

        Oh  get  a  grip.. Janet  has no standing  to  challenge  MJ’s Will  & it’s  executors..4

        by  the  way. a  condo   can be home.. a closet can  be  a home..  you mean house??..  well  the  estate apparently   maintains  it  for Katherine.

    • anon

      Michael wrote a will with very strict instructions. To not uphold the will to Michaels wisshes means every will ever written could be overturned for everyone not just the Jacksons. Why have wills if not upheld as intended.. Its Michael’s children that need to be protected not Michales siblings. Janet needs to deal with what the will said & no one is out to get Janet but Janet herself.

      • Anonymous

        If you had told your siblings that you didn’t trust two people who worked for you and even fired them, do you think your siblings would trust a will that gives those two fired ex-employees control over your estate when you die?

        • Anonymous

          oips..  sorry..  I replied  on top..

          it’s very  convinient  for  the siblings  to s ay  anything about  MJ’s  executors.. &  very self-serving  on their part..  considering  MJ hardly  spoke  business with them.. hence..  why  they  weren’t part of MJ’s  business..

          meanwhle.. no matter  what  went  down  with MJ  & Branca  &Branca  has  spoken about this..  MJ  never made another Will.. &  if  he loathe Branca so much–  he  could have filed  court  documents  to change his  executors–  MJJ DIDN’ !!!  HE HAD  FROM  2002  TO  2009..  TO  DO  IT

          fact MJ   didn’t  do  it.. his WILL stands  as  it  was/is.. &  the  Jacksons can  just  zip  it..    what’s more    they  have no standing  to   challenge  that WILL.. why  they are  doing  it   in  the media.. demanding the  executors  to  resign??   WHAT  A  JOKE!

          • Anonymous

            Michael and Janet were very close. She defended him when no one else would and went after people like Madonna who trashed talked him.  Up until he died Michael and Janet had nothing but nice things to say about each other. And let’s not forget that Michael was up to his eyeballs in debt before he died. It was JANET who paid the mortgage on Neverland Ranch and continued to help her brother out financially. She even had to foot the bill for his funeral because his accounts were EMPTY!!! So yes, I am more inclined to believe Janet over whomever keeps releasing falsehoods to TMZ.

            • Anonymous

               tmz  wasn’t  releasing  falsehoods.. but  rather exagerating their   news..

              like    I already  mentioned.  there’s  something f iled at  the  probate  court from the  estate f or  Mrs  Jackson..  but  this as made  before    the  sibling ruckus,

              TMZ  just  went to  town  with this info–  conjecturing.. but  yes..   the estate filed.. as  the estate  needs permission from  thecourt.  that’s why it’s a huge joke  & laughable    the  Jack  4  accusses  the  executors for stealing  & fraud..

            • WATK

              That’s great that she came to his aid. It is what should be expected. However, having your brother’s back in life does not entitle you to his estate or decision making power over his estate when he passes if he has a will naming his heirs , beneficiaries and executors. Period. BTW: the supreme court ruled it was valid. 
               The executors clearly have managed the estate wisely and turned it around. 10% is standard fee for attorneys doing this work – it just happens that they get 10% of a big pie but it is what it is. They also have to report all their activities and account for all money to probate court. Probate court is no joke . They demand accountability and leave no stone unturned in dealing with the handling of an estate. There is a court appointed attorney looking out for the best interest of the children that is not affiliated in any way with Branca, et al. Look up Margaret Lodise’s bio – she’s a pretty impressive chick with a very impressive resume and I would argue she knows her shish and is not being influenced by anything except what is right and legally in the best interest of the children. 

              Everyone who stands firm to adhere to the will cannot be painted as crooked and in someone’s pocket. Perhaps they are just doing their job and that job includes protecting the estate from any involvement or profit by the rest of the Jackson family.  

            • Anonymous

              thank  you!!!  that’s  wh–  the  bumbling  4  are/were  a joke  calling  these  executors crooks..  wh  in  actual fact–projection on  their part– as  they are  the crooks..  and dealing  with Howard  Mann..  really.. such  desperation

              also.. no  doubt the  state  of c alifornia watches  thisestate closely as  they  get  a hugef taxes from  it.

        • Anonymous

          what’s more–  the  Jacksons  didn’t  even know  Michael  had a  WILL..  did  you know  that??  it was all over the  media as  soon as Mj died.. assuming  MJ  didn’t have one.. Randy immediately  announced himself  as  executor  &  Katherine as  the  administrator..

          so having this  in mind.. how can MJ be   talking  Wills  to his  family??   &  wht he thinks  of  Branca??  when  they  hardly saw  the  guy!

          No one knew  about   this WILL.. as it  turned out  Branca was on  vacation  when MJ  died..  so    no one knew  a  Will  Existed.. until  banca returned  from holiday..  boy!  the  shock of  that family !!!!!!   and  tthis was even before  the  reading of the  Will.. lol..  

          they  have been screaming  fake  eversince..   esp  finding out  MJ shut  them all  out  ..  which  isn’t  really surprising.. as  MJ never had  any of  his bros  in this  business.

        • Anonymous

          further note  &  info..  this  came    from  FORBES  MAG..  they  did some research and  it  appears Mj made  4  WILLS   starting  in  the  mid  1990′s.. in  all  4  Wills..  he  appointed  John Branca  in  all  of  them..  it’s  the  co-executors  who were changed  until  the  final   one JOhn Mc clain.. whose black  &  a  record  producer.

          so fat  chance the  siblings  can topple  John  Branca.I can see w hy MJ  chose him.. as  Branca  heped  him  buy  the  ATV-Beatles catalogue  &  is a  great negotiator and this is  why  within  3 short  years..  Mj’s estate is  practically out  of debt.

    • Tony

      So what I want to know is who engineered the MJ death hoax which lead many to “believe” he was still alive and in hiding and why did they do it? Was it the Jackson family in order to mess with fans heads or perhaps an attempt to prevent the Will from being executed on at all if there was reason to believe he was still alive? Was it the estate lawyers in order to keep the fans confused? Was it Sony to keep people engaged and push for sympathetic post-death music sales which seems to have worked? Was it the Hollywood Illuminati to distract the public from an actual murder they pulled off? Who is Dr. Conrad Murray really and who was/is he working for? Why was the Murray trial faked and performed by lesser known actors including the Judge? After more than three years of more questions than answers, I think it’s safe to say that the public has grown tired of all this and are disengaged now. If there is a real purpose behind it all, it seems we will never know the truth and therefore must move on with life. One goes to school to learn but if the teacher never shows up for class, the students become unenlightened, bored and leave. Class dismissed.      

    • Anonymous

      What pople d on’t realizE  is– no matter  what happened  with MJ  &  branca?  the Will  MJ made stood  as it  was–  IF  he didn’t  want  Branca  etc  to be executors  he  would have  flled   to change  them  in  court  documents.
       
      he d idn’t  !!!! hence.. Branca stayed  on as his executor.
       
      by  the way–  weeks  before he died..  MJ  decided  he wated his old crew back.. hence why  Frank Dalo  was  engaged.. &  MJ asked for Branca too..  they  had a meeting at  Staples..

      • http://www.facebook.com/jerilyn.bridges Jerilyn Bridges

         There is a problem! If that will ignores personal debts, Branca and Jackson get tucked for fraud! Branca has to answer and I don’t like what happens then! The will stands but debts are paid!  The brothers are no longer liable for those debts! Jermaine is paying some Chinese man because he signed for a loan and Michael didn’t pay it back! That set Jermaine back eight million! Janet payed upkeep for a Thome Thome scheme involving Neverland while Michael was in Baharain embarassing Jermaine in front of Halima! That will stands, the bills stand and If I were Jermaine or Janet, I’d have no problem leaving Michael with his own mess! If you’re worth a billion dollars, eight million ain’t a problem!

        • Anonymous

          why don
          t  you write  John  Branca a personal letter  &  complain  to him  directly about these  issues??.. and make  him explain  to you  personally your  qualms about    his  business  practices..and show  you what he’s  done  if anything.. 

          tell  him to pay off ths  8 millions  if  the estate hasn’t  fdone it already.

          it  appears  the estate paid  off   Kathaerine’s  debts w ith those Koreans 

        • Anonymous

          personally,  I  do believe  the siblings can NEVER  topple  those  executors  try  as hard  as they  want to..  that  is a done deal..  they are answerable  to  the  LA  courts.

          the only  ones  who  can  change them  in due  course will  be  MJ’s  own  children   when  they  are older.

          In MJ’s  trust..  when one   of the executors can no longer serve the  estate.. MJ allowed   the executor  to name his  successor.. Branca  et co  are  in this  for the long haul.

        • Anonymous

          it’s not hard to get  Branca’s address..  his office is in  century  city.

          do  Write him  &  tell him t o pay  off these Mj  debts.

        • Anonymous

          by the  way it’s PAID.. not  ‘payed’.

    • http://www.facebook.com/julie.brighton2 Julie Brighton

      Sure, Janet, tell us more BS like Randy, Rebbie and Jermaine did. You want that money now because you are a has-been and no longer relevant…

    • Orville Lloyd Douglas

      Janet Jackson is a multi millionaire according to Forbes Magazine Janet has a fortune of over $150 million dollars and that was back in 2007. Since 2007, Janet had a NY Times best seller, she appeared in two Tyler Perry movies, she also has an endorsement with a diet company, and she had a huge hit tour last year. So for people to say Janet is broke they are way off she’s probably the richest Jackson family member besides Michael.